 |
| |
|
|
| DATE: |
July 23, 2001 |
|
| FROM: |
Graham B. Spanier |
|
| TO: |
P. Richard Althouse |
Janis E. Jacobs |
| |
Stephen R. Curley |
John S. Nichols |
| |
Diane M. Disney |
Gary C. Schultz |
| |
Rodney A. Erickson |
Susan Welch |
| |
Geoffrey G. Grivner |
David N. Wormley |
| RE: |
Task Force on Tuition |
|
The
financing of higher education has become ever more challenging in recent years,
and Penn State is no exception. Our current and future efforts to enhance the
quality of our teaching, research, and service missions will depend largely
upon our ability to secure sufficient financial resources. Failure to do so
would undoubtedly preclude us from improving-or even maintaining-Penn State's
standing as a world-class university.
While Commonwealth appropriations
have become a progressively smaller share of the University's budget for
several decades, Penn State has faced significant cost increases for salaries
and benefits, capital improvements and maintenance, information technology, and
library materials, as well as other cost drivers. Despite substantial and
continuing cost-cutting measures, tuition has had to increase substantially for
many years in order for Penn State to remain competitive with our peer
institutions in terms of the quality of educational experience we provide.
Quality must remain a cornerstone principle even as we consider issues of
affordability and accessibility that have long been a part of our mission as a
public and land-grant university.
It is unlikely that state
appropriations in Pennsylvania (or any other state, for that matter) will
increase at a sufficient rate to reverse the relative decline in the public's
contribution to Penn State's support in the coming years. Thus, we are left
with the prospect-or more likely, the reality-that tuition will have to assume
an even larger share of the University's operating budget. There are many
issues that arise as we consider this future scenario, including the need for a
thorough review and analysis of practices and policies regarding tuition levels
and differentials. |
I am
creating a Task Force on Tuition and asking that you serve as a member of this
group. I would like the task force to begin its work immediately with a goal of
producing a draft report by mid-December of this year. Provost Erickson has
agreed to chair the group.
I
am charging the task force to consider realistic projections of a range of
tuition increases that may be necessary over the next 5-10 years to support the
continued competitiveness of the University as a premier institution. I would
like the task force to examine a number of critical issues and develop
models/options and recommendations for specific aspects of tuition practices
and policies including the use of differentials (e.g., differential tuition
based on academic major and costs/demand for program; differentials based on
upper/lower division; differentials by campus locations; differentials based on
residency status, etc.). You should also be prepared to make recommendations on
policy regarding the use of surcharges and fees as they relate to tuition, and
such issues as the relationship of tuition levels in resident versus on-line or
other distance educations. I will also appreciate your recommendations
concerning alternative models of how significant tuition increases are
introduced (e.g., increase borne predominantly by incoming students versus
spread across new and incumbent students). In addition, it will be important to
consider any recommendations in relation to our commitment to access.
Specifically, please consider the extent to which our financial aid programs
will be able to accommodate our students. There will undoubtedly be additional
questions and issues that arise as you delve further into these matters, and I
along with other members of the Board of Trustees, look forward to receiving
your analysis and the options and recommendations you provide us.
Please let Dr. Erickson know as soon
as possible regarding your willingness to participate on the task force. This
is an important assignment for the future of the University, and I appreciate
very much the expertise and effort you will bring to this task. |
| |
|
|
| cc: |
Board of Trustees |
|
TUITION
TASK FORCE COMMITTEE MEMBERS |
| |
|
|
|
Rodney A. Erickson, Chair Executive
Vice President and Provost |
Anthony E. Wagner Special Assistant to
the Senior Vice |
| |
|
President for Finance and Business |
P. Richard
Althouse University Budget Officer |
Susan Welch
Dean, College of the Liberal Arts |
Stephen R.
Curley Assistant to the Executive Vice President |
David N.
Wormley Dean, College of Engineering |
| |
and Provost; Financial Officer |
|
|
Diane M.
Disney Dean, Commonwealth College |
Bonnie J.
MacEwan Administrative Fellow to the |
| |
|
Executive Vice President and Provost |
Geoffrey G.
Grivner Undergraduate Student |
Kelly
Snyder Administrative Fellow to the |
Janis E. Jacobs
Vice President for Administration |
|
Vice President for Development
and Alumni Relations |
John S. Nichols
Chair, University Faculty Senate |
|
|
| |
Professor of Communications |
|
|
Gary C. Schultz
Senior Vice President for Finance and |
|
|
| |
Business/Treasurer |
|
|
|